Name: Pointspread Pauper
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 22 February 2012

Suzannah,

Of course you are a shill for CSX Corporate, my dear.

Who in the readership do you think feels any different?


You and NoMo have to stick to the topic of "gate crossing accidents"
and the driver being at fault because once you move outside that
"zone" of safe conversation...

...you then have to defend conduct that CSX itself cannot defend.

There are serious issues of "stewardship" and "trust" not to commit
regulatory violations which affect the safety of police officers,
firefighters and paramedics and yet you can't talk about those
subjects precisely because...

...CSX has no answer themselves.

CSX has just been found guilty of firing an employee who obeyed the law
and reported worker injuries. They then told that employee he failed to
meet a Federal hearing/audiology standard when NO SUCH FEDERAL STANDARD
EXISTS.

The jury didn't buy into CSX's counterarguments; neither did the
judge who had the option of throwing the verdict out

 It does not take much to intuit that the intent of CSX was to frighten
 into silence 40 or so other employees who may have witnessed what
happened to their coworkers and leave EVEN MORE dangerous violations go
unreported.

CSX is going to be publicly confronted as to whether that doctor was
referred to the 'disciplinary committee' of his State Medical
Association for lying to a patient.

The physician first serves the patient and not the corporation....

...but the Police Chiefs are going to worry about the UNREPORTED yet
not UNKNOWN violations that may have endangered safety even more.

It is TOO GREAT A RISK to leave the CSX Corporate Officials where they
currently are