|
Name: RRJ
E-mail:
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 30 April 2012
Indie
No one is throwing them under the bus. I pointed out three people had
to be involved the train crew, employee in charge of the 707, and the
train dispatcher. All this info on here is hear-say nothing more.
Unfortunately it's usually the train crew that takes the hit. It's
always been that way nothing new. Still people have to use common sense
if times frames exceed the norm then calling the EIC is the safe course
the other is to stop the train before entering if contact can't be
made. I can't imagine taking an hour to clear a 707. Again that's
hear-say. There are limitations that need to be adherd to one can't
just assume.
View This Article |
|
Name: Indie
E-mail:
Employed as: Conductor, for Less than 1 year
Posted: 30 April 2012
RRJ, NoMo, and Slack Action,
That bridge foreman is known for calling the train ahead of time
before the train is even close to the 707 and giving permission through
his limits and all restarts, when he plans to slip away for lunch.
He/they like very long lunches and breaks. The recordings should
tell all. Those so - called "union guys, through and through"
shouldn't attempt to throw the union train crew brethern under the
bus.
View This Article |
|
Name: RRJ
E-mail:
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 30 April 2012
Getting permission and taking an hour is excessive. There's two people
onboard if anything happened with an unexpected stop calling to inform
the EIC on the 707 should of been the train crews first action then the
TD. The restart should of been as natural as breathing air. Getting
permission thru a 707 is just about an every trip experience mon-fri.
The other question length of service of the LE and conductor. I did
have times where the EIC was just putting up signs where they contacted
me or I contacted them knowing I wouldn't clear before the time came
into effect. Usually if some time elapsed 15-20 minutes I still called
before entering to make sure they remembered. It's called common
sense. This goes both ways it was the EIC's responsibility to make
sure the train had cleared. To get on the rail he had to call the TD
for permission to make sure no trains needed to clear. Now we have
three involved T&E, EIC, and the TD each playing a role in this
situation.
View This Article |
|
|
Name: slack action
E-mail:
Employed as: M of W, for 10-20 years
Posted: 29 April 2012
NOMO:
Yes, you are right : Any time you talk to a dispr it is recored but
between crew members and M of W and any other line of road maintainers
it is not recored.
View This Article |
|
|
Name: NoMo
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 29 April 2012
Hey Slack:
If the crew wanted to stop they "should" ask permission from the
Dispatcher. Likewise, if the train went into emergency, the Dispatcher
would be notified.
Lacking any communication between the train and Dispatcher there is an
episode right out of the "Twilight Zone"!
View This Article |
|
|
Name: slack action
E-mail:
Employed as: M of W, for 10-20 years
Posted: 29 April 2012
NOMO:
The dispr tapes is only a recording between the dispr and whoever
he/she is talking too. If a train crew talks to a M OF W worker it is
not taped unless it is close to a major terminal that might have it on
tape and even then it is a remote chance.
View This Article |
|
Name: NoMo
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 29 April 2012
It sounds to me, based on the limited information in these posts,
there's plenty of blame to go around. However, if they were hit by
the same train they cleared an hour earlier, the train crew take the
hit.
I would start calling several miles in advance for permission. The
posts didn't say if there was a siding within the 707. If they were
put into the hole for any length of time, it's easy to forget to call
for a restart. A stop at the Circle K for something is a possibility
but an hour seems excessive and you would still have to call for a
restart. Sounds like the train went into emergency, it would take the
Conductor a while to walk the train and the crew forgot about the 707.
Post it notes are wonderful thing!
The dispatch tapes would be definitive!
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: M of W, for 1-10 years
Posted: 28 April 2012
In defense of Marvin and Johnny, the train was granted permission
through Marvin's small 707 and an hour had passed by the time they got
back. Yes, they should have asked the train where they were. However,
why did it take over an hour for the train to reach the work area in
that small 707? Was there an unscheduled stop in there somewhere? If
so, where was the request for the restart? None of the ones involved
are company suckass's either. The are union boys through and through
and if anything are anti-company. I've worked with these guys and
would know.
View This Article |
|
Name: yardlimits.com
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 28 April 2012
NoMo,
The 2 golden boys whose M.O.W. truck got hit by the train on the
Nashville Division were Marvin Hargis and John Sanders Jr. They might
get jackets for their achievements.
View This Article |
|
| | | |