CSX-Sucks!

Safety First

Rule #1 -- Don't get hurt.

    Safety is the first priority. Er, or is it the second, after money.... Or the third after getting the trains out....



Showing 1381-1400 of 18220 articles posted under "Safety First?"

All 18220 articles on one big page.

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 23 April 2012

Road formans with nothing better to do then harrass the engineers and
other staff, causing a hostile work enviroment. When will it stop??

  View This Article

Name: RRJ
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 23 April 2012

The Ryan Budget Plan passed the house but was rejected by the senate.
The provision concerning Railroad Retirement was attacking the tier 1
portion of the retirement. It wants to bring the tier 1 levels to that
of Social Security. What is misrepresented is even though RRB tier 1
pays more the extra doesn't come out of taxpayer funds there would be
no savings of $2 billion. Even the carriers are against this proposal.
If the republicans win control of both the house and senate this could
become a reality.

  View This Article

Name: Binheer2long
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 23 April 2012

Brother, is not this the same legislation algor proposed almost word for
word?? Can it be that Paul Ryan has copied from another students test
paper??

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Friend or family of employee, for 10-20 years
Posted: 22 April 2012

Havent seen any talk on here concerning the budget proposal by Ryan Paul
(R-WI) that eill take away RR retirement and give social security
instead. Have you read it? Its available on the BLET website. It passed
the house and will go to the senate after the election. If republicans
gain control of the senate, it will pass. If we end up w a republican
president it will surely be signed. I would hope a strike would occur
and shut down the system until its repealed, but who knows. Hope you
guys all take time to read up on this and advise your friends and
family.

  View This Article

Name: listen up?
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 30+ years
Posted: 22 April 2012

READ THIS VERY CAREFULLY? !!!!! WHEN YA GET ORDERS TO COMMIT A POSSIBLE
UNSAFE ACT?  THIS  SHOULD OR COULD BE YOUR RESPONSE?

ARE YOU TELLING ME TO COMMIT AN UNSAFE ACT? SPELL THIS OUT?  DO NOT
REFUSE !  GET A WITNESS?   REPEAT  OVER RADIO IF NEED BE ?  !!!!




P.S .    JUST A THOUGHT AFTER  GETTING   HARASSED  MYSELF  90+
EFFICIENCY CHECKS IN A YEAR!  WORK SAFE    ! SLOW IS GOOD   AND SAFE   
WATCH YOUR BACK !!!!!

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Car repair, for 10-20 years
Posted: 21 April 2012

The reason there is no times on the air slips is because alot of times
we are working 2 trains at once starting at the head end and working
back. Then you crews come along and want the train and we dont have
time to run up there and put a time on it for you. We got jobs to do
just like the crews, except we pound rocks ALL DAY unlike road crews
who get to sit 90 percent of the time. It only takes a few seconds to
ask anyway.... big deal... you wait on everything else half the time
anyway. Thats why blue flags get forgotten too. Managements breathing
down our necks to get inspections done and you show up before we can
get back up there after we have to tell the boss man that your track is
done so he will shut the hell up!

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Car repair, for 1-10 years
Posted: 21 April 2012

for the record every air slip for every train in selkirk train yard is a
total lie.no carman has inspected the brakes on a train in a long
time.why do you think you always have to ask for a time for your
airslip???

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Crew Dispatcher, for 1-10 years
Posted: 20 April 2012

CSX Crew Management at work plus him

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79r5tK5CcEk

  View This Article

Name: Hobo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Employed in other capacity, for 30+ years
Posted: 20 April 2012

April 19 2012 will always be a RED letter day for CSX claims Department
with a FEDERAL jury in Atlanta returning a 20 million dollar award for
a injured plant worker that was ran over by a car delivered with a
faulty brake. The jury also found CSX 100% libale.

Same Day.  Jacksonville Fla.  Federal jury returns 1 million award to
injured employee.

Neither of these claims ever had an offer from the claims department. 


These are the people with their, childish attitudes, watching out for
CSX financial future. They should all be fired and the claims
department outsourced to professional claim agents.

  View This Article

Name: slack action
E-mail: 
Employed as: M of W, for 10-20 years
Posted: 19 April 2012

CSX TRAIN HITS CAR, TOW TRUCK ON TRACKS NEAR D.C.: Riverdale Park, Md.,
police arrested a D.C. man on St. Patrick’s Day, alleging that he drove
his car while intoxicated onto the railroad tracks in this Prince
George’s County town and got stuck. The car and a tow truck trying to
move it were then hit by a CSX freight train. [Washington Post website
report, 3-18-12]

People like this cost the tax payer hundreds of million dollars a year.
  The numerous trains backed up and stopped for hundred of  miles, the
numerous federal and state investigators tied up with the
investigation.  All because the federal government refuses to install 
ignition interlock devices on all vehicles or on at least people who
have been charged with DUI.  Over 3700  DUI incidents  at RR xings at
grade x $800,000 per incident = over 2.5 billion dollars it cost the
tax payer... we can lower the nations budget by putting in IID's in
all cars.  Pines get on this, you can change the world.  Our tax
dollars are being throw out the window with these drunks trying to help
drunks.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Employed in other capacity, for 1-10 years
Posted: 18 April 2012

General Managers on csx have to be the worst on purpose.   csx cHore
Values or they have a picture of ward naked in a herd of sheep.

cindi  is laying real low these days after brownshirt was rejected out
the door.    Fire any one that can cause them harm.   Keep dumb ass 
ones who will do what ever they want.




csx does not own this place yet but they seem to bribe someone at
times.    the website filter out some stuff  

proxitymafia.com

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: CSX Contractor, for 1-10 years
Posted: 18 April 2012

As is common knowledge csx (lowercase on purpose) is the worst managed
railroad in the nation. And rightly so due to the backwards logic they
adhere to. Also in management there is no professionalism or integrity.
To be fair tho, there are some in non-management also. This is by far
the most degrading and oppressive corporation I have ever worked for. I
am to old to change careers again so I am stuck. Instead of management
and the unions(which I feel are scratching each-others butt)zeroing in
on these people that are pulling the rest of us down,they have soured
the whole bushel. Where has the personal Honor, Integrity and pride in
ones self gone? Employees that are being lied about and set-up just so
some of these trainmasters and other corrupt individuals can get
brownie points might find themselves lied about and SET-UP one day.
Doesn't have to be on the job you know, some just take as much as they
can and then things start happening. You can only push so much so far.
Look at the division stats of write-ups/investigations, you can see
plainly something is going on. I have been told that csx bought this
website and does monitor it,if so you guys need to pull your heads out
and reeducate certain GM's (and on down the chain), on
respect,dignity,fairness and ethical behavior, That's all I would ask
for. I think it would be in the companies best interest if they
remembered that WE ARE A VERY BIG part of this process of making this
company profitable.

  View This Article

Name: Robert Pines
E-mail: btpino40@gmail.com
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 17 April 2012

RE: Employed as: CSX Customer, for N/A

I would think CSX does like 8 times that amount in fraud a DAY just on
fuel.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: CSX Customer, for N/A
Posted: 16 April 2012

Pines can add this one to his collection.   Maybe the names will change
with ones we know on here.



Gordon Fuller of Plainfield, ex-railroad executive, accused of $800K
fraud

He was CEO of Morristown and Erie Railroad

Gordon Fuller of Plainfield, the former chief operating officer of a
Morristown and Erie Railroad, and William Phillips of Langhorne, Pa., a
former project manager for the company, have been indicted Wednesday on
charges that they defrauded the state Department of Transportation of
more than $800,000 by submitting false claims for grant funds in
connection with railway improvement projects.

The state Division of Criminal Justice obtained a five-count state
grand jury indictment charging Fuller, 71, E), the freight railroad’s
CEO, and Phillips, 60, the project manager, with conspiracy, misconduct
by a corporate official, theft by deception, submitting false contract
payment claims, and tampering with public records.

The indictments are the result of an investigation by the Division of
Criminal Justice Corruption Bureau. The investigation previously led to
the indictment of a suspended DOT engineer, Gaudner B. Metellus, and an
alleged accomplice on charges they solicited the Morristown and Erie
(M&E) to fraudulently inflate the cost of a state-funded rail project
by over $700,000 and pay them $325,000 in bribes. M&E alerted the state
to that alleged fraud after Fuller was terminated by the company in
2010.

“We charge that this former railway company executive exploited a state
grant program that was designed to keep our freight rail network strong
in New Jersey, stealing over $800,000 by collecting grant funds for
work that was never performed,” state Attorney General Jeffrey S.
Chiesa said. “We will continue to crack down on individuals who
fraudulently enrich themselves or their companies at the expense of
government programs.”

“This is a good example of an investigation in which our efforts to
uncover and prosecute one crime led to new leads, which we diligently
pursued to charge another crime,” state Criminal Justice Director
Stephen J. Taylor said.

In connection with the indictments, it is alleged that between January
2003 and August 2010, Fuller had M&E submit invoices to create and
reinforce the false impression that certain work had been completed on
four railroad improvement projects for which M&E received DOT grant
funding. In fact, very little of the work had been performed. It is
alleged that M&E fraudulently received a total of approximately
$804,090 in grant funds from the DOT as a result of the false claims.
Phillips allegedly participated in the fraud by submitting false claims
while serving as project manager for M&E between 2003 and 2005.

Deputy Attorney General Perry Primavera presented the indictment to the
grand jury. The investigation was conducted by Det. Sgt. David Salzmann,
Det. Michael Behar, and Deputy Attorney General Anthony A. Picione.

The DOT implemented the New Jersey State Rail Freight Assistance Plan
in 1975 in an effort to preserve and improve the railway freight
transportation network in the state. Under the program, rail lines
doing business in New Jersey apply for funding to assist in various
rehabilitation projects. Eligible projects receive state grants
covering 70 to 90 percent of the total project cost, with the balance
to be paid by the rail line.

M&E, which operates in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maine, received
approval in 2003 for the four projects that are at issue in the
indictment. They involved proposed rehabilitation and upgrading of
three sections of track in Kenville and Cedar Knolls – with related
improvements such as security fencing and lighting – and replacement of
a railway bridge span over the Passaic River in East Hanover.

The grant program requires that no funds be disbursed until all work
has been completed for a particular portion of a project. It is alleged
that Fuller and Phillips knew of the requirement, but fraudulently
submitted invoices for a total of $1,319,417 worth of work, creating
the false impression the work was completed, when in fact only $52,745
worth of work was completed. As a result, M&E received $804,090 in
grant funds it was not entitled to receive.

Second-degree crimes carry a sentence of five to 10 years in state
prison and a fine of up to $150,000, while third-degree crimes carry a
sentence of three to five years in prison and a fine of up to $15,000.

The indictment was handed up to state Superior Court Judge Mary C.
Jacobson in Trenton, who assigned it to Morristown, where Fuller and
Phillips will be ordered to appear in court at a later date to answer
the charges.

Fuller is also named in a Nov. 1 indictment charging him with
conspiracy, insurance fraud and theft by deception, all in the second
degree, as well as fourth-degree falsifying or tampering with records.
That indictment alleges that Fuller fraudulently inflated an insurance
claim by more than $75,000 in connection with damage to a railroad
switch on M&E rail lines in Morristown caused by a truck accident in
2005. Those charges are pending.

The June 29, 2011 indictment charging Metellus, 32, of Philadelphia, a
senior DOT engineer, and his alleged accomplice Ernest J. Dubose, 31,
of Boston, alleges that they solicited representatives of M&E to engage
in a scheme to fraudulently inflate the cost of a project to
rehabilitate the Eagle Rock Railroad Bridge in Roseland from about
$693,000 to $1,421,510 in connection with an application under the
state grant program.

Metellus and Dubose allegedly proposed that the company submit false
invoices for rehabilitation work that would never be performed, and
demanded that the company split the state grant funds with them.
Metellus was responsible for confirming the need for repair work and
inspecting completed work in connection with the grant program.
Officials of M&E alerted the Division of Criminal Justice and
cooperated in the state’s investigation. The two men were originally
arrested and charged on Sept. 23, 2010. The charges in that indictment
are also pending.

—TOM HESTER SR., NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Employed in other capacity, for Less than 1 year
Posted: 14 April 2012

This is what happens when you have uneducated people running the
company.

ALBANY — A rail freight company must pay more than $186,000 to a worker
who was illegally fired after he raised safety issues, the U.S. Labor
Department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration announced
Thursday.
Albany-based CSX Transportation Inc. was also ordered to remove all
references to the firing in the personnel file of the worker, who had
lost his job as a track maintenance worker at the Selkirk rail yard in
March 2010.
The worker, whose identity was withheld by OSHA, went to work for CSX
in June 2011 at another location, said OSHA spokesman Ted Fitzgerald.
The worker's lawyer, Charlie Goetsch, said the 14-year veteran of CSX
learned of a "near miss" of two freight trains and filed a safety
complaint with federal regulators. No one was hurt in the incident,
said Goetsch, with the regional law firm of Cahill Goetsch & Perry,
located in New York City, Boston and New Haven.
Goetsch said the safety violations alleged by the worker were validated
by federal investigators. "But even if they had not been, the law
prohibits the railroad from retaliation against a worker for raising
the claim," he said.
"This is a clear case of retaliatory discharge, the type of behavior
toward employees that the law is designed to stop," Said Robert
Kulick, OSHA's regional administrator
CSX was ordered to pay the worker $100,000 in punitive damages and
$86,082 in compensatory damages as well as train its managers on laws
that protect whistle-blowers under the Federal Railway Safety Act.
"Due to the emotional and financial toll of the railroad's treatment
of its employee, we are ordering that both punitive and compensatory
damages be paid to this worker," said Kulick.
In March 2010, the worker, who at that time was a dispatcher, filed a
complaint with OSHA alleging that he had been fired for raising safety
issues during a disciplinary proceeding. The worker invoked seniority
rights and got another CSX position as a track maintenance employee,
where he was again fired after a single day on the job.


Read more:
http://www.timesunion.com/business/article/186G-freight-for-firing-3478708.php#ixzz1s3XzPfWY

  View This Article

Name: Robert Pines
E-mail: btpino40@gmail.com
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 13 April 2012

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=71445516-0791-41ed-94fc-fae879bb36ff
Rail fuel surcharge antitrust litigation
CSX Revenue 2011 $ 11,743,000,000
CSX charged in fuel surcharges @ 50% -- $ 11,743,000,000 x .33 =
$3,875,190,000
CSX Fuel expense 2011 $1,668,000,000
1/2 CSX fuel expense 2011 already figured in $834,000,000
CSX theft 2011 on just fuel overcharges --- A little over $3 BILLION
DOLLARS.

  View This Article

Name: Robert Pines
E-mail: btpino40@gmail.com
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 12 April 2012

This weeks CSX trail of death and destruction


http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2431184&spid=
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/man-hit-by-train-1411528.html
http://www.dailymail.com/News/breakingnews/201204080054
http://www.claimsjournal.com/news/southeast/2012/04/11/204780.htm
http://www.wkyt.com/wymt/home/headlines/Crews_on_scene_of_train_crash_146425775.html
http://www.walb.com/story/17380403/train-hits-tractor-trailer-in-homerville
http://ohsonline.com/articles/2012/04/08/fra-requiring-locks-for-locomotive-cabs.aspx?admgarea=news
http://www.thedailytimes.com/Local_News/story/Remembering-Kevin-Stinnett-Family-of-Maryville-teen-killed-by-train-celebrates-his-life-id-022466

  View This Article

Name: suzannah
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 10-20 years
Posted: 11 April 2012

ALL T&E

If you are not aware yet, the FRA has finally addressed all the
questionable issues that we had with the hours of rest law that was
impossed. The carrier was having a problem interpreting exactly how the
law was supposed to be impossed which has resulted in running crews into
the ground. Example: Im on the engineers extra board and was called for
a local job that went on duty at 6 am. We outlawed on the job(not
unusual for this job) and marked off after 7 pm. The next morning after
I was rested they called me for it again. Because I went on duty after
midnight(a new calendar day) the carrier reset my starts. We outlawed
again and marked off after 7. The next day they called me again for
another job one hour after my rest and again reset my starts because I
was called after midnight. My starts that morning showed "0" even
though I was on my 3rd job back to back 3 days in a row. Because the
law was written that starts may be broken if no work is done before the
next Calendar day, it has allowed the carrier to run us into the ground.
Just imagine if the only way you could get a day off is if you had 6
starts. With this process you would never see a day off! 
FRA -49 CFR Chapter II(Docket No. 2009-0057, Notice No.2) will be
effective on May 29, 2012

In the interim interpretations, FRA defined the "day" in the
consecutive days limitation to be a calendar day, on the basis that
such an interpretation would be administratively simpler.(HA! HA! HA!)
Experience with the application of this definition and public comment
on the definition show that the "calendar day" interpretation was
more complicated and provided less protection against fatigue than
originally anticipated. As a result, the fra has revised its
interpretation of "day" in the context of the "consecutive day"
limitation to refer to the 24-hour period FOLLOWING an employee's
final release from duty. 

If an employee does not initiate an on-duty period within "24 hours"
of the employees final release from the PREVIOUS TOUR OF DUTY this will
count as a "day" in which the employee did not initiate an on-duty
period and the string of consecutive days will be broken.

Thank god they have finally straightened this out. Now all we have to
do is see how long it takes the company to figure it out!

  View This Article

Name: PISSED
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 1-10 years
Posted: 10 April 2012

TO All ENGINEERS!!!

Better get your butts in gear and get on your local chairmans to charge
a complaint against the redi center. Seems the new hires coming out are
being told when they get to their assigned yards and finish their
training if there is any jobs they dont feel they have learned enough
on to go ahead and take the calls for them anyway. They dont need to
worry because the ENGINEERS will take care of them. This crap got
started months ago when cmc was telling the new hires that were freshly
marked up and wanted pilots that they didnt need one because the
engineer was supposed to be qualified on the job and they would take
care of them. THIS CRAP HAS TO STOP! The blet needs to know every
single time you get a new guy that tells you this. We need to document
this stuff. WE ARE NOT conductor trainers. ITS NOT OUR JOB! This might
explain why there are so many new guys out there who wont call signals,
fill out signal logs or talk on the radio to dispatcher and you end up
having to do all of it so we dont get our arses charged with crap! I
have heard several make the comments that "ALL THAT STUFF IS THE
ENGINEERS JOB!"  Time to put a stop to this. Im going to be taking
names and comments like that to my LC and maybe even start sending it
to the International till someone steps in and starts watching our
backs! With all the new crap coming out on the engines and the tattle
tell boxes(ERAD) and everything else we are getting threatened to be
written up on we dont need to be babysiting either. Several of us have
been told if conductor wont call sigs then you have too! If you dont
you will be written up too! Time to stop covering their butts!

  View This Article

Name: kyle
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 20-30 years
Posted: 10 April 2012

I recall a few yrs back when we had a interchange with conrail & the
b&le railroad, we interchanged loaded ore trains with them,, it was a
long going fued with that rr, we had some conrail conductors who would
measure the piston travels on all the cars from the b&le, Ie the emptys
comming back, the conrail men would do it to get more OT, then 1 day the
b&le got pissed off, as conrail delieverd 2 ore trains to them, the b&le
shoped the entire 2 trains for out dated air brake tags, conrail had to
drag them both back to the home yard for inspection, ya talk about 2
railroads who did not like each other, when that happened it remined me
of what kids in the 4 th grade would do to ya know get even, now there
is no more ore trains, just more peeps out of a job, yea its true you
can,t make up shit like this, heck the branch line to the b&le was even
abandoned.

  View This Article

Previous Next
www.CSX-Sucks.com
don't click here