|
Name: ===Todd Novac===
E-mail: I suck a Dick .com
Employed as: Yard Master, for 10-20 years
Posted: 26 April 2013
=======Todd Novac ======= updates . he has made a complant to CSX about
harassment that this should be not talked about !!!!!! he claims he
only barrowed the money and as a union official he was allowed to do it
without breaking the law . LOOK at medina county criminal records . We
should all stand up against him Fuck the company And fuck the UTU for
letting him Back Fuck you ===Todd Novac
View This Article |
|
Name: John
E-mail: na
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 25 April 2013
I do not work for CSX. I am in my second semester of college. But
there is a name that pops up here a lot!!! And his daughter even told
me about it and I said,"NO WAY!!!" About this site otherwise!! And
I can't stand the son of bitch myself!!! So I must say and admit on
this site right now, I just had the best anal sex with his his
daughter. HEY, DON'T JUDGE!!! She asked for it!! And we are getting
ready to do it again this evening!! You shouldn't work midnights
man!!!LLLMMMAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOO:0);0)
View This Article |
|
Name: ==Todd Novac==
E-mail: scumbag .com
Employed as: Yard Master, for 10-20 years
Posted: 24 April 2013
TODD NOVAC Yardmaster at Collinwood In at Cleveland ohio . Fat fuck
with a pumpkin head . stoled money from our union BLE and was found
guilty !!!!!!!! and the came back as a yardmaster .It shows how weak
are unions are !!!!! No one should even talk to him .what happened to
employee un becomining !!!! what a piece of fat shit!! I am sure he is
a snitch for the trainmaster . stand up against him he is no good !!!.
And also he stated I was going to pay it back . like they all do
!!!!!!!!!
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 20 April 2013
Think about this. Turnover= quick dime vs slow quarter.
Freight rate is less, but the movement is not there for a long time.
The space is consistent. Now what?
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: APE, for 20-30 years
Posted: 18 April 2013
the question about the low intermodal profit margin reminds me about the
old Chevy Vega......GM were able to make a very high quality Vega, for
about 30k a car, that was competitive with the Corolla in initial
quality. What Toyota could do, and GM could not, was to make a high
quality 3K car. Now, can CSX develop a management capable of meeting
UPS and Schneider standards without spending excessive money? It has
not so far. Otherwise you keep the low margins.
View This Article |
|
|
Name: Retired FRA Inspector
E-mail:
Employed as: Friend or family of employee, for Less than 1 year
Posted: 17 April 2013
Conrail also claimed to have a low profit margin for intermodal
business. But they sure pushed it! I would guess that the rates stay
low in order to compete with the highways. And corporate America will
do anything for a dime.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 17 April 2013
Ok I agree 14% of the rent and 38% of the space. Now what? Do you want
to throw them out and seek a new renter, or raise the rent?
______________________________________________________________________
Employed as: APE, for 10-20 years
Posted: 12 April 2013
Let's review these notes from the Annual Report of CSX, Page 3.
The merchandise business shipped nearly 2.7 million carloads and
generated approximately 57% of revenue and 42% of volume in 2012.
The coal business shipped 1.3 million carloads and acounted for nearly
27% of revenue and 20% of volume in 2012.
The intermodal business accounted for approximately 14% of revenue and
38% of volume in 2012.
I don't know about y'all, but if I had a roommate that was only
coughing up 14% of the rent- they sure wouldn't be taking up 38% of
the space.
Let's just say- considering all the investments made to support this
low-margin business- what else is going on? The numbers just don't
make sense.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Conductor, for 10-20 years
Posted: 17 April 2013
yes I agree he needs to be got read of.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Conductor, for 1-10 years
Posted: 17 April 2013
yes I know this is not professionalism, but it needs to be said FUCK
Frulla I'm glad the coal fields are finally sticking together and
putting csx in a bind with no one available.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Corporate office, for 10-20 years
Posted: 16 April 2013
Crane just got Burrus's job. Maybe people can not be so uptight now
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Employed in other capacity, for 10-20 years
Posted: 16 April 2013
Wake up it is time to consolidate our unions call your local Teamsters
office to get assistance with representation.
Go to: https://nlrb.gov/forms download NLRB Form 502 – petition.
Download form and get signatures, let us end our differences and
consolidate for the benefit of the employee.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 12 April 2013
APE 1 yr and Nasty,
Unfortunate is the fact that there are bad apples in ANY industry,
however that being said I don't believe the casual and outside look
you present here represents Union Officers as a whole. Most aren't
"in it for themselves" as you claim. Most are in the job to better
the working conditions for the membership PERIOD. Perhaps if you had
more time on the railroad and didn't look at only what you want to
believe and are fed by our wonderful media, and took the time to show
up at your local union meeting you might start to view otherwise.
Biased Opinions such as yours presented here are nothing more than
baseless misinformed bullshit and serve to do nothing else than prove
how baseless and misinformed you are about what REALLY goes on in the
union world. Try stepping up and serving others than yourself, do that
and then you might have a reason or rationale for some of what you
espouse, until then you're nothing other than a company troll on this
site.
View This Article |
|
Name: Nametaker
E-mail:
Employed as: APE, for 10-20 years
Posted: 12 April 2013
Let's review these notes from the Annual Report of CSX, Page 3.
The merchandise business shipped nearly 2.7 million carloads and
generated approximately 57% of revenue and 42% of volume in 2012.
The coal business shipped 1.3 million carloads and acounted for nearly
27% of revenue and 20% of volume in 2012.
The intermodal business accounted for approximately 14% of revenue and
38% of volume in 2012.
I don't know about y'all, but if I had a roommate that was only
coughing up 14% of the rent- they sure wouldn't be taking up 38% of
the space.
Let's just say- considering all the investments made to support this
low-margin business- what else is going on? The numbers just don't
make sense.
View This Article |
|
| |